Annex V provides the structural template for the EU Declaration of Conformity (DoC) required under Article 22. It specifies every field that must appear in the declaration, from product identification through to the conformity assessment procedure used and the signatory's details. Manufacturers preparing a DoC should use Annex V as their checklist to ensure no required element is missing.
Required Fields in the EU Declaration of Conformity
Annex V specifies the following mandatory fields for every EU Declaration of Conformity under the CRA:
- Product identification: Product name, model number, type, batch number, or serial number sufficient to uniquely identify the product covered by the declaration.
- Manufacturer name and address: Full legal name and registered address of the manufacturer. For non-EU manufacturers, the authorised representative's name and address must also appear.
- Declaration statement: A clear statement that the manufacturer (named above) takes sole responsibility for this declaration of conformity, and that the product described meets the relevant requirements.
- Regulatory references: An explicit reference to the CRA — Regulation (EU) [number] — and to the specific articles and annexes that the declaration covers. This typically means a reference to Article 5 and Annex I.
- Harmonised standards or specifications applied: References to the specific harmonised standards, common specifications, or other technical specifications applied to demonstrate conformity. Include standard number and version/date.
- Conformity assessment procedure: Identification of the assessment module used (for example, 'Module A — Internal Control' or 'Module B + Module D').
- Notified body reference: Where a notified body was involved, its name, notification number, and the number of the certificate issued.
- Other applicable EU legislation: References to other CE marking regulations applicable to the same product, if a combined declaration is used.
- Date, place, and signature: Date and place of issue, name and function of the authorised signatory, and their signature.
Drafting the Product Identification Section
The product identification section must enable unambiguous identification of the product covered by the declaration. For physical products, this typically means including the model name, model number, hardware version, and firmware version at the time of the declaration.
For software products, the declaration should cover a specific software version or version range. A declaration for 'version 2.x' covering the entire 2.x product line is acceptable only if all versions in the range genuinely comply with the essential requirements covered by the declaration. If a specific release introduces a security feature that brings a previously non-compliant version into compliance, separate declarations covering each compliant version range may be appropriate.
Where a product has multiple hardware variants (for example, different form factors or connectivity options), the declaration should either cover each variant explicitly or clearly define the scope of coverage in a way that avoids ambiguity.
Referencing Standards and Technical Specifications
The standards reference section of the declaration is important evidence of how compliance was demonstrated. Manufacturers should reference:
- The specific harmonised standard number and date/version (for example, 'EN 303 645 V2.1.1 (2020-04)')
- Any common specifications adopted by the Commission
- Relevant ISO/IEC standards applied as supporting evidence (these do not provide formal presumption of conformity but are relevant to the technical assessment)
Vague references such as 'applicable ETSI standards' or 'industry best practices' are not adequate — the declaration must be specific enough to enable a market surveillance authority to independently assess whether the referenced standards cover the essential requirements claimed.
Where the manufacturer has not applied any harmonised standard — perhaps because none exists for their product category — the declaration should reference the internal testing and risk assessment methodology used, and the technical documentation must contain the detailed evidence.
Signing the Declaration
The EU Declaration of Conformity must be signed by a person with the legal authority to commit the manufacturer. This is typically a director, a senior compliance officer, or a legally designated responsible person. The signature should be accompanied by the printed name and function title of the signatory.
The declaration must also indicate the place and date of issue. Electronic signatures are generally accepted under EU electronic identification regulations (eIDAS), but manufacturers should verify the specific requirements of national market surveillance authorities and any applicable sector-specific guidance.
For combined declarations covering multiple regulations, a single signature from the same authorised person is typically sufficient, but some member states or notified bodies may require additional signatories for specific regulatory modules. Legal review before finalising the signature process is advisable for complex products.
Maintaining and Updating the Declaration
The DoC drawn up under Annex V must be maintained throughout the product's active market life and for 10 years after the last unit is placed on the market. Manufacturers must be able to retrieve and provide the DoC to national market surveillance authorities within a short timeframe (typically 10 working days under comparable EU product regulations).
When a product is updated in a way that affects its compliance — for example, a major firmware update that introduces new security features or changes the product's architecture — a revised DoC should be issued. The revised DoC should reference the updated product version and, where applicable, updated standards or assessment procedures.
Version control of declarations is important: each version should be clearly dated and should state which product version or firmware version it covers. Old versions should be archived, not deleted, as they may be relevant to market surveillance investigations concerning historical product versions.
CVD Portal helps you comply with Annex V automatically.
Public submission portal, 48-hour acknowledgment tracking, Article 14 deadline alerts, and CSAF advisory generation. Free forever.
Start your free portalFrequently asked
Can one Declaration of Conformity cover multiple product models?+
Yes, provided the models share the same design, architecture, and compliance basis such that a single assessment covers all of them. If models differ in security-relevant ways — different connectivity options, different firmware stacks, or different intended use environments — separate declarations are appropriate. The declaration must accurately describe what is covered, and authorities should be able to clearly determine whether a specific product model falls within the declaration's scope.
Is there an official EU template for the CRA Declaration of Conformity?+
Annex V provides the required content structure, but not a word-for-word template. The Commission and ENISA are expected to publish guidance and example declarations to assist manufacturers. In the meantime, manufacturers can use Annex V as the structural checklist and adapt existing DoC templates from other CE marking regulations (such as the RED or LVD) to the CRA's specific requirements.
Does the Declaration of Conformity need to be published online?+
The CRA does not mandate online publication of the full DoC, but manufacturers must make it available on request. Best practice — and the expectation under Article 22 for simplified declarations — is to make the DoC accessible online through a stable URL. Online publication demonstrates transparency and makes it easy for market surveillance authorities to access the document without formal requests.
What happens if I sign a Declaration of Conformity for a product that later turns out to be non-compliant?+
If a product is found non-compliant after the declaration was issued, the manufacturer faces enforcement action under Article 32. Where the declaration was issued knowingly for a non-compliant product, this may be treated as a misleading declaration subject to Tier 3 penalties (€5 million or 1% of turnover) in addition to the Tier 1 or Tier 2 penalties for the underlying non-compliance. The signatory may also face personal liability in some national legal systems.
Related CRA Articles
Need a CVD policy that satisfies Annex V?
Download a free CRA-compliant template and deploy it in minutes.