HackerOne vs CVD Portal
Crowdsourced vulnerability discovery aimed at large security teams. How does HackerOne compare to CVD Portal for an EU manufacturer subject to the Cyber Resilience Act?
- Headquarters
- San Francisco, United States
- Category
- Bug bounty and VDP platform
- Pricing model
- Free response-only VDP tier; paid bounty, triage, and pentest tiers priced on request.
How they compare on CRA-critical features
Five capabilities that matter most for EU manufacturers under Articles 13 and 14 of Regulation (EU) 2024/2847.
Where HackerOne is strong
- +Largest curated researcher community in the bug-bounty market.
- +Mature managed triage offering with severity assessment and duplicate handling.
- +Established CVE assignment partnership through MITRE.
- +Wide enterprise tooling: SSO, audit logging, role-based access.
Where it is not a CRA fit
- !Headquartered in the United States. EU data residency is not the default and is typically negotiated as part of an enterprise agreement.
- !Paid tiers target larger security budgets. There is no published low-tier plan optimised for an EU SME manufacturer that simply needs to satisfy Article 13.
- !No publicly advertised CRA Article 14 workflow covering the 24h early warning, 72h detailed report, and final report to ENISA and the national CSIRT.
- !The platform is structured around the bug-bounty programme model. Manufacturers whose primary obligation is a published CVD policy and a contact channel pay for capabilities they do not use.
The CRA gap
Article 13 requires every manufacturer of products with digital elements to publish a CVD policy and operate a single point of contact for reports. Article 14 mandates a three-stage reporting cascade to ENISA and the relevant national CSIRT whenever an actively exploited vulnerability or a significant incident is identified. HackerOne addresses the intake side of Article 13 well at the enterprise tier but does not publicly advertise an Article 14 reporting workflow or default EU data residency.
Why teams pick CVD Portal for CRA
Five reasons EU manufacturers choose CVD Portal over HackerOne.
- 1
EU-hosted infrastructure. Default GDPR posture, EU-resident analytics, no transatlantic transfer agreement required.
- 2
Free tier covers Article 13 baseline: whitelabel intake email, 48h acknowledgment SLA per ISO/IEC 29147, and a publication-ready CVD policy template at €0/month.
- 3
Article 14 workflow is first-class: 24h, 72h, and final-report timers tied to ENISA Single Reporting Platform submission on Enterprise.
- 4
Designed for the manufacturer scope of the CRA (Annex III important and critical important categories), not the bug-bounty programme model.
- 5
CSAF 2.0 advisory generation is in the platform, not a separate add-on.
Frequently asked
Is HackerOne CRA-compliant for an EU manufacturer?
Is CVD Portal a bug bounty platform?
Can I migrate an existing HackerOne VDP to CVD Portal?
Where is CVD Portal data stored?
How does pricing compare?
Switch to a CRA-native disclosure portal in under an hour
Article 13 baseline at €0/month. Article 14 reporting workflow included. EU data residency by default. No card required to start.